Sharing, Relationships and Facebook’s destruction of traditional human behaviour.

It’s a word that is now more synonymous with self-marketing on social media platforms, rather than the sentiment of the act itself.

I come from a group of people who began their internet use in the early to mid 90’s.
I spent most of my time from 1995 to 2001 on mIRC, chatting with my group of likeminded friends and occasionally physically meeting up with them for awkward fun times in the line outside HMV, waiting for Marilyn Manson’s signature.

I had an opendiary from the age of 16, a livejournal from the age of 18, and a myspace, about a year or so before Facebook became the juggernaut that it now is. “Sharing” is something I’ve done since the internet first entered my world.

All of these online hangouts cultivated a genuine sense of community, of togetherness, rather than the self-marketing narcissism that we now encounter on Facebook. Behaviour I am guilty of displaying on a daily basis.

Until Facebook, the internet felt fairly safe. Small, yet full of possibility. It felt like the things you said, the pictures you posted – all of that was yours. It was under your control. And it was very easy for you to see who had access to view such things. There was a sense of fairness and transparency that doesn’t seem to exist anymore – not just on the internet, but in the world in general.

Everything is so tangled up in hidden terms and conditions, or language so convoluted that you need a degree in Contract Law to understand even the most basic transactions. I think most can be summed up as such: “You, the consumer, are getting screwed, and paying for that privelege”.

In Facebook and Google’s case, you, the user, are not the consumer, you are in fact, the product, which means that Facebook only gives enough of a shit about you and your rights to keep you using their service, so they can keep selling your behaviour to marketing companies.

Fine. They exist to make money, like any other corporation, and they haven’t exactly lied about the fact that it’s you who makes them their money. It is what it is in this day and age.

My problem with Facebook is what its dominance of society has done to people, and is doing to entire generations of people who know no other way of life.

Around two or more years ago, a very good friend of mine decided to delete her Facebook. Her reasons behind it have always stuck with me.

“I realised I was using my friends as my own personal Entertainment Roll”, she explained.

She found herself getting annoyed if a usually-funny friend was mediocre that day, or was posting something serious and depressing. She was seeing them not as her friends, but as objects that existed to entertain her in the way she expected them to, and she was not engaging in their lives, merely watching as an outsider, liking here, commenting there.

I’ve found myself either being treated in that manner, or absolutely hating people I barely know, based on their Facebook posts.

Beside that point, humans, naturally, as they age, lose friends. Our social circles shrink to allow us the mental, emotional and physical space to raise families and focus on careers, or whatever it is that is most important to us. Facebook forces us to acknowledge and interact with people we didn’t even interact with when they existed physically in our lives, even if the interaction is just a mental one – acknowledging that they are on your friends list, and whatever you say may offend them. You may not really care about offending them, but that anxiety is there, in the back of your mind.

The problem is that with such social pressure to add people, we end up sharing things with the people who would least like to know that information. People like our families and coworkers.

There are certainly solutions to the problems outlined above. We can always remove people from our friends list, and then deal with whatever social fallout may come of it. We can create filters, and spend hours arranging our friends and family members into groups, which will further allow us to pick and choose what we share with whom.

But all of that is a lot of work, and quite frankly, it takes up time that could be put to much more constructive uses than maintaining unnatural relationships simply because “that’s the way the world is, now”.

I can’t deny that Facebook has given me positive things, including wonderful connections with people I didn’t interact so much with in my former, face to face life with them.

Unfortunately, I just feel that Facebook is now taking more from me than it is giving, and it is encouraging me to take a back seat in regard to the manner in which I maintain my friendships.

Most of what it is taking, I’m not even entirely aware of.

Facebook’s ability to reach large numbers of people with your message is only as effective as the audience with which you share that message. I may have 370 Facebook friends, but unless I actively engage with each and every one of their personal pages on a constant basis, or vice versa, my posts will disappear from their NewsFeed. If you Facebook solely via your NewsFeed, you are only interacting with the same, relatively small number of people – people with which you are most likely to already share common opinions on most topics.

So what’s the point of sharing on Facebook?

Is it to get a pat on the back for being one of the first to show it to your friends? Is it to generate that warm feeling of “I’m right. A lot of people are agreeing with me”.

It certainly made all the sharing of ideas I did in the run up to our recent Federal Election rather pointless – everyone who actually spoke about it on my NewsFeed all had the same opinion as I did. I wanted to reach those who were indifferent, or those who wanted to vote Liberal. I wanted to be able to at least provoke thought or discussion. Unfortunately, most of the discussion that was provoked was “Facebook is not the place to discuss politics”, or “I wish the election would just be over, I’m sick of hearing about it”.

Thankfully, that same person who deleted her Facebook a few years ago is still very much a large part of my life. In fact, she is the person who taught me that true relationships are about engaging. They are about being honest, even when it’s going to hurt someone’s feelings. They’re about having integrity. And they’re about you, going out of your way to make the effort to share your life with someone else.

Facebook makes it easy for us to tell a whole bunch of people something. It generates conversation. But it’s all surface bullshit. It’s the narcissistic mask that the user wants to share with the world. It’s always on that person’s terms.

This morning, my non-Facebook friend sent another article she found interesting to the mailing list she has created of her friends and family with whom she frequently discusses well, anything, actually. That email generated real sharing amongst relative strangers who have come to know each other through our mutual friend’s stories, and through our own Reply Alls.

We come from very different backgrounds, with very different life experiences, which creates such a large picture of what are usually society’s most complex issues – everything from gender equality to mental health, fitness plans and pop culture. In that tiny little environment known as our inbox, we are throwing ideas, opinions and observations at each other, opening each others eyes to pieces of the puzzle that would never have occurred to us otherwise.

We are sharing knowledge and experience and it is exciting. It is meaningful. It engages our thoughts and interest for more time than it takes to click “like”, and I feel far more gratification from these email exchanges than I’ve ever felt from any response to my Facebook posts.

I’m not threatening to leave Facebook right now, though I am definitely considering it.

Besides, I’m too old to have 270 friends. As if I can be bothered writing that many “heartfelt” birthday messages when my NewsFeed prompts me to…


9 thoughts on “Sharing, Relationships and Facebook’s destruction of traditional human behaviour.

  1. Congrats. You probably made the company a few hundred bucks just by using the name 30 times in a sort of mixed emotion chant. I avoid the popular site like the plague. I see what it does. I see how it grows exponentially. The internet has always had great potential for good and bad. There should be no surprises if we are open to the possibilities. Perhaps the biggest problem with certain “social media” sites are terms like “friends”. When you can add and subtract these icons you call friends like skin cells, you no longer have any value. Creating the network only makes a stronger web for the ones running the show to find someone. You create a crime tracking database which could be used to stop crime or commit unspeakable crimes. Crazy talk? Maybe. But, I’ve heard enough about these unnecessary empires and obsessive activities.

    You seem to be on the fence about this one.

    • Thanks for your comment.

      I am somewhat on the fence because I haven’t made my mind up about the pros and cons list I’ve been formulating in my mind.

      This post didn’t just magically pop into my head today. It’s something I’ve been considering for some time and while it seems that I have a fence paling fair and square up by bum, the truth is that I’m actually leaning far closer to complete and utter account deactivation than I am to maintaining any kind of activity on the site.

      The only real question I have left, is whose contact details do I take with me? I don’t mean that in a… gross contest sort of way. I need to put some thought into the relationships that I can and realistically would actually maintain if both parties had to put in extra effort.

      I’m sure there are people I would love to keep in touch with who just wouldn’t be able to factor that into their already busy lives. Social Media has that convenience factor.

      • Perhaps, you could have jotted down the thoughts separately before posting your final assessment?

        “a fence paling fair and square up by bum”

        ?? What the heck does that mean?

        The funny thing is deactivation or closing of an account doesn’t always erase what’s been put online. The lesson for any internet “sharer” to learn is to mind what they put “out there” before doing just that. When you send a signal into space, it only vanishes when it exhausts its energy source. The internet won’t completely erase anything until the source is exhausted.

        Convenience is one of mankind’s vices created in its effort to simplify life.

      • This post wasn’t necessarily a final assessment. It’s observations I have made that would hopefully provoke some sort of discussion. This is how I do.

        The fence paling reference was to say that although it seems to you that I’m firmly on the fence, the reality is that I’m only partly on the fence – most of me is looking towards deactivating my account, however there is a part of me still wondering whether I will actually pull off that move or not.

        I am also fully aware that deactivation of my account does not mean the content is erased. I am simply looking to draw a line in the sand whereby I cease using that platform to connect with the world.

  2. You want to reread what you just wrote?:) …Fenced. Part of you on one side…part of you on the other. Some lines are easier to draw than others. The hard ones are often hindered by obsessive thought or emotional response.

    • And you’ve summed me up in a nutshell:

      I find it incredibly difficult to draw lines because I am constantly hindered by both obsessive thought and emotional response.

      Add to that an obsessive need to please everyone in every camp, and you have me – not the most decisive person on the planet…

      • How DO you function, then?

        Mention of you in a nutshell gives me a crazy, cute image of a stuffed animal-person not unlike the Popples of the 80’s which could fold into themselves. Imagine a plush you folding into a walnut:P

      • I have a small purple and pink one I found at a thrift store some years ago. Yea, they were something special:) Not too long ago, they tried reinventing them with Japanese “pokeballs”…that was back in 1999-2001.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s